skimming blogs, i came face to face with the following verities:
& elsewhere:
which reminded me of this from i believe the last, or one of the last, published stories of gilbert sorrentino:
but all that simply reiterating what, in 1941, edward dahlberg wrote in CAN THESE BONES LIVE:
dahlberg was talking about melville.
________________________
and… later that same day i come across this nice dose of schadenfreude for the trades–but it too is bitter tasting. E.g. Roth might’ve been optimistic:
[but what that article doesn’t mention in its death-of-publishing prognosticating, is the renaissance of small presses, doing all the important work once done by the james laughlin’s and the barney rosset’s of yester-millennium. literary history of the 21st century probably will mention knopf and random house less, and maybe even FSG less, than that of the independents–both the more “established” like dalkey, fc2, green integer, and soft skull and the new and scrappy like calamari, dzanc, les figues, starcherone and clear cut.] [that is: publishing is dead; long live publishing; et cetera.]